bug#48042: 26.3; Macros don't work with french-postfix input method

[Gregory Heytings]

> > If you are asking how I'd like to proceed with this bug, then, as I 
> > wrote in another message, I'd like us to have a full understanding of 
> > why binding inhibit--record-char didn't work well enough in the case in 
> > point.  It did solve some of the problem we had before that change, but 
> > didn't solve all of it -- why?
>
> BTW, another possible way to attack the problem is to arrange for the 
> code that pushes to `unread-command-events` to use events of the form 
> `(t . EVENT)` so as to tell explicitly that we don't want them recorded.

I guess you mean '(no-record . EVENT)'?  The docstring indicates that '(t 
. EVENT)' means that EVENT is added to 'this-command-keys'.