bug#48042: 26.3; Macros don't work with french-postfix input method

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> If you are asking how I'd like to proceed with this bug, then, as I wrote
>>> in another message, I'd like us to have a full understanding of why
>>> binding inhibit--record-char didn't work well enough in the case in
>>> point.  It did solve some of the problem we had before that change, but
>>> didn't solve all of it -- why?
>>
>> BTW, another possible way to attack the problem is to arrange for the code
>> that pushes to `unread-command-events` to use events of the form `(t
>> . EVENT)` so as to tell explicitly that we don't want them recorded.
>>
>
> I guess you mean '(no-record . EVENT)'?  The docstring indicates that '(t
> . EVENT)' means that EVENT is added to 'this-command-keys'.

Oops, indeed,


        Stefan