bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#59897: 29.0.60; csharp-ts-mode: variable-name fontified as method wh


From: Jostein Kjønigsen
Subject: bug#59897: 29.0.60; csharp-ts-mode: variable-name fontified as method when invoking method with generic type-argument.
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:52:53 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2

On 08.12.2022 11:12, Theodor Thornhill wrote:
Jostein Kjønigsen <jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net> writes:

When I use the new csharp-ts-mode, method fontification is usually accurate 
with only 1 exception which I have
encountered so far:

When calling methods on objects, and that method accepts a generic 
type-argument. You typically see this in
Startup.cs-like files in ASP.Net Core projects:

services.AddSomeExtensionWithoutTypeArguments();
services.AddSomeExtensionWithTypeArguments<MyType>();

In the above cases we see that fontification of "services" differs.

For the first line, services is fontified using font-lock-variable-name-face 
(correct), but in the latter case services
is fontified using font-lock-function-name-face (incorrect).

In both cases I expected services to be fontified using 
font-lock-variable-name-face.

Can you test this patch, Jostein, and if you're happy, please install,
Yuan :-)

I beat you by 3 minutes, but I'll be a gentleman and test none the less :D

You test mine, and we can see which one we prefer?
BTW, I think the ruleset is getting pretty gnarly in csharp-mode, so
maybe we should consider slimming it down a little (without losing
granularity) for perf reasons down the line!

Theo

It's getting somewhat intricate, agreed. It's IMO not entirely obvious what the different rules are for or what cases they are meant to support.

In that regard, I miss our old test-suite from github's csharp-mode. It was a nice safety-net when making changes like this.

--
Jostein






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]