bug#60751: 30.0.50; Treesit indent rule with missing semi in java-ts-mode

[Theodor Thornhill]

Hi Yuan!

Consider this java code (point at |, and note the missing semi):
```
class foo {
    public void foo() {
        var x = foo
            .foo()|
     }
}
```
If I press RET now, indent ends up here:
```
class foo {
    public void foo() {
        var x = foo
            .foo()
        |
     }
}
```

Matched rule is (which I'll change in a bit anyway):
```
((parent-is "block") (and parent parent-bol) java-ts-mode-indent-offset)
```

and the parse tree is:
```
(program
 (class_declaration class name: (identifier)
  body: 
   (class_body {
    (method_declaration
     (modifiers public)
     dimensions: (void_type) body: (identifier)
     (formal_parameters ( ))
     (block {
      (local_variable_declaration type: (type_identifier)
       declarator: 
        (variable_declarator dimensions: (identifier) =
         value: 
          (method_invocation object: (identifier) . name: (identifier)
           arguments: (argument_list ( ))))
       type: ;)
      }))
    })))
```

and when this is invoked at point:
```
(treesit-node-at (point)) ;; #<treesit-node "}" in 90-91>
(treesit-node-parent (treesit-node-at (point))) ;; #<treesit-node block in 
35-91>
```

In a way I would expect it to match either variable_declarator or
local_variable_declaration.  I know this behavior has changed a couple
of times the last year, wrt treesit-node-at and treesit-node-on, but
it's a little over my head how this calcutation is done.

In this case the syntax tree has no errors, but the code won't compile.
Do you have any suggestions for how to remedy this in java-ts-mode only,
or is this something to be considered for treesit.el?  Or maybe even a
bug in tree-sitter-java?


I see the tree-sitter playground [0] returns:
```


program [0, 0] - [8, 0]
  class_declaration [0, 0] - [6, 1]
    name: identifier [0, 6] - [0, 9]
    body: class_body [0, 10] - [6, 1]
      method_declaration [1, 4] - [5, 6]
        modifiers [1, 4] - [1, 10]
        type: void_type [1, 11] - [1, 15]
        name: identifier [1, 16] - [1, 19]
        parameters: formal_parameters [1, 19] - [1, 21]
        body: block [1, 22] - [5, 6]
          local_variable_declaration [2, 8] - [3, 18]
            type: type_identifier [2, 8] - [2, 11]
            declarator: variable_declarator [2, 12] - [3, 18]
              name: identifier [2, 12] - [2, 13]
              value: method_invocation [2, 16] - [3, 18]
                object: identifier [2, 16] - [2, 19]
                name: identifier [3, 13] - [3, 16]
                arguments: argument_list [3, 16] - [3, 18]
            MISSING ; [3, 18] - [3, 18]
```

Which in turn could be something new not supported in the version I run?

Theo

[0]: https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground