[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coretutils package produces the ownership issue during "mv" command
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: coretutils package produces the ownership issue during "mv" command execution. |
Date: |
Tue, 14 May 2013 12:19:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 05/14/2013 11:14 AM, Koteswararao Nelakurthi wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> On 05/14/2013 10:15 AM, Koteswararao Nelakurthi wrote:
> > lchown("/media/sda2/aaa", 0, 0) = 0
> > write(2, "mv: ", 4mv: ) = 4
> > write(2, "failed to preserve ownership for"..., 48failed to preserve
> ownership for /media/sda2/aaa) = 48
> > write(2, ": Function not implemented", 26: Function not implemented) =
> 26
>
> So that suggests the lchown worked but the warning was printed anyway.
> There is nothing I can see in the upstream source that would cause that.
> Perhaps a local change between coreutils-8.5-r6.0.6 and
> coreutils-8.5-r6.0.7
> is causing this?
>
> Dear Padraig Brady,
>
> Thanks again for your valuable response.
> May I know to how to check the difference
> (May be patches wise) between r6.0.6 to
> r6.0.7 of coreutils package
> Probably..by looking at git web interface
> of coreutils package ?
> can we find the same?
>
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=shortlog
The difference to coreutils_8.5-r6.0.6 and coreutils_8.5-r6.0.7 is not
in the coreutils project, but in your distro. I had a quick look for
source for these and while the first gave a few hits, I didn't
see any repos to view history. I'll leave it yo you to determine
the differences.
thanks,
Pádraig.