[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: removal of kill?
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: removal of kill? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:20:48 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
On 09/11/15 16:58, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 09/11/15 16:48, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 09/11/15 16:02, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>>>> On 11/09/2015 04:27 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>>>> I see on most GNU/Linux distros that kill(1) is
>>>>> provided by the shell or util-linux.
>>>>> Should we just remove it from coreutils?
>>>>
>>>> What about non-Linux systems, i.e., where util-linux is not
>>>> available? I personally don't have such a system, but I think
>>>> GNU software should not forget about such platforms.
>>>
>>> Absolutely. Though in this case the shells cater
>>> for kill(1), or the platform already provides it.
>>
>> Note that POSIX requires an 'exec'able kill program.
>> I.e., the shell-provided one is insufficient when you want to
>> invoke it via a program like xargs.
>
> OK I'll assume for now that platforms
> might not have a separate kill program,
> and move it to disabled_by_default_progs.
Attached.
coreutils-kill-no-build.patch
Description: Text Data
- removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Jim Meyering, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Jim Meyering, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?,
Pádraig Brady <=
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/09
- Re: removal of kill?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/11/10
- Re: removal of kill?, Pádraig Brady, 2015/11/10
- Re: removal of kill?, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/11/10
Re: removal of kill?, Mike Frysinger, 2015/11/09
Re: removal of kill?, Stephane Chazelas, 2015/11/09
Re: removal of kill?, Tomas Nordin, 2015/11/09