[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] ls: Clarify the effect of option -k
From: |
Jean Delvare |
Subject: |
[PATCH] ls: Clarify the effect of option -k |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:26:04 +0100 |
Users may expect a different effect from option -k than is actually
implemented, especially when the effect of that option has changed
over time. The info page explains it well, but "ls --help" (and thus
the ls.1 man page) do not.
* src/ls.c: Improve the description of option -k.
---
src/ls.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- coreutils.orig/src/ls.c 2017-12-01 10:14:46.297551197 +0100
+++ coreutils/src/ls.c 2017-12-01 10:45:17.298050350 +0100
@@ -5203,7 +5203,15 @@ Sort entries alphabetically if none of -
-i, --inode print the index number of each file\n\
-I, --ignore=PATTERN do not list implied entries matching shell
PATTERN\
\n\
- -k, --kibibytes default to 1024-byte blocks for disk usage\n\
+"), stdout);
+ fputs (_("\
+ -k, --kibibytes default to 1024-byte blocks for disk usage;\n\
+ affects the per-directory block count written
by\
+\n\
+ -l and -s, and the size written by -s, but not\
+\n\
+ the file size written by -l (use\n\
+ '--block-size=1024' for that)\n\
"), stdout);
fputs (_("\
-l use a long listing format\n\
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
- [PATCH] ls: Clarify the effect of option -k,
Jean Delvare <=