Re: display word wrapping

[David Kastrup]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:

> On 08 Jun 2004 12:10:49 +0200
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Ok, then there is no objection from the view of preview-latex.  But
> > the documentation in the Elisp manual needs to get changed.
> 
> Of course.
> 
> > And since the old behavior was already documented, perhaps we should
> > not change image-type to hold something entirely different.
> 
> No problem.
> 
> > How about having it be a constant containing all image types
> > _potentially_ supported by that compilation?  The complete actual set,
> > if it was needed, could then be gotten with
> > 
> > (delq nil (mapcar (lambda(x) (and (image-type-available-p x) x))
> >   image-types))
> 
> It's OK to me.

Anyway, what does image-type-available-p imply exactly?  Should it
perhaps get an &optional display argument like display-images-p does?

For example, postscript images are only supported on frames appearing
on X, and so on.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum