Re: emacs -Q not documented

[Werner LEMBERG]

> The difficulty in finding a long name for it reflected a lack of
> apparent coherence of the functionality of the option.  Nobody could
> see what it was good for.  That is why I thought of removing it or
> changing it.

Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs.
After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal
is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you
would normally like to have for daily work.


    Werner