[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow.
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow. |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:36:10 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Jan Djärv <address@hidden> writes:
> Am I the only one that sees this:
> `/bin/pwd`/temacs --batch --load loadup bootstrap
> make[2]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Avbruten (SIGABRT)
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jhd/src/emacs-unicode2/src'
> make[1]: *** [bootstrap-build] Fel 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jhd/src/emacs-unicode2'
> make: *** [bootstrap] Fel 2
> It aborts here (alloc.c):
> 4844 staticpro (varaddress)
> 4845 Lisp_Object *varaddress;
> 4846 {
> 4847 staticvec[staticidx++] = varaddress;
> 4848 if (staticidx >= NSTATICS)
> 4849 abort ();
> 4850 }
I recently got the same bug report from Duncan
<address@hidden>. As I usually build Emacs without
gtk, I didn't notice it. Without gtk and with
enable-font-backend, staticidx reaches 1279! In HEAD, it
reaches 1193.
> If I increase NSTATICS to 1281 it does not abort. This is with GTK. When
> compiling with GTK an extra gtk-version-string is staticpro:ed, so compiling
> without GTK does not abort. I also get (GTK or non-GTK version):
> emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1211344 bytes needed)
I don't see that in non-GKT version, though. The last step
of dumping shows this message.
Dumping under names emacs and emacs-23.0.0.6
1209872 pure bytes used
> Is it OK to just increase NSTATICS a bit? Shouldn't staticvec be dynamically
> allocated BTW?
It was increased from 1026 to 1280 about 4 years ago.
Perhaps there was a good reason for not chaning it to be
allocated dynamically ... I'm not sure.
1026 is 0x402, 1280 is 0x500. What is the good value for
NSTATICS this time; 0x600 or 0x602?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow.,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Jan Djärv, 2006/08/03
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/03
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/03
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Jan Djärv, 2006/08/07
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/07
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Duncan Mak, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., David Kastrup, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Duncan Mak, 2006/08/04