[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow.
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow. |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:09:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> 1026 is 0x402, 1280 is 0x500. What is the good value for
> NSTATICS this time; 0x600 or 0x602?
>
> Try 0x7f0. That should fit nicely in a block that malloc can get
> with no wasted space.
Since staticvec is statically allocated there is no need to care for
malloc overhead.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/03
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Jan Djärv, 2006/08/03
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/03
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/03
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Jan Djärv, 2006/08/07
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/07
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow.,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Duncan Mak, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., David Kastrup, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Duncan Mak, 2006/08/04
- Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow., Richard Stallman, 2006/08/04