[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:05:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I've learned to appreciate Bzr and have trouble reproducing my
>> workflow with Git (especially the shared repository which Git seems only
>> able to somewhat approximate in a half-assed way, not mentioning the
>> lightweight checkouts which Git seems unable to handle).
> What do you mean? git clone will use hardlinks when cloning a local
> repository, so it's very fast for me.
Yes, it's shared when you "git clone" but 3 years down the line, there's
not much sharing left. I.e. the sharing is only approximated.
> Isn't speed (and some space efficiency) the reason to use bzr
> shared repositories?
Yes, speed and space (inefficient space usage is a problem both for
speed and for backup purposes).
Stefan
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David De La Harpe Golden, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Daniel Colascione, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David De La Harpe Golden, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., joakim, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Juanma Barranquero, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Bastien, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Engster, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03