[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:34:32 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Why was gedit developed? It looks advanced to me. (I have never used it.)
Why was not Emacs used as a basis for gedit?
I don't know why gedit was developed, but I'd guess it was intended
to be 100% as simple as the editors of otherGUI systems.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), (continued)
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Sivaram Neelakantan, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Sven Axelsson, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Tom, 2014/01/18