[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?)
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Sven Axelsson <sven.axelsson <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> Cursor movement - I see in the documentation and all over the
> Internet stated that you should use the default movement
> shortcuts because they are much more efficient than the arrow
> key bindings. Do people really find this true?
I'm a longtime emacs users (>15 years) and I don't use those
keys. I use the arrow keys. Use what you find comfortable.
As far as I'm concerned most of the default bindings are
uncomfortable (C-f, C-n, C-n, C-p etc.) and I don't use them.
Create your own Emacs experience. The great thing with emacs is
that you can do that. There is no single optimal way which fits
everybody.
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), (continued)
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Richard Stallman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Sivaram Neelakantan, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Sven Axelsson, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?),
Tom <=
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), chad, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Tom, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Xue Fuqiao, 2014/01/19
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Richard Stallman, 2014/01/19
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/19
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Phillip Lord, 2014/01/20
- New tutorial (was: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]), Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/20