[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr] |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 07:10:22 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
There could be a setup of Emacs that is as easy as any editor to learn. It
is the advanced features that will take time to learn.
I guess that we are really discussing is if there is an advantage of such a
setup.
We could make an incompatible "simple" interface for Emacs and make it
easy to learn. It could look just like gedit, perhaps.
It might be better, overall, if gedit were implemented as such an
interface to Emacs. I am not sure it would have been less work, though.
However, if you change it that much, it won't give people an easy pathway
to using Emacs. Its commands would be all different.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), (continued)
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Sven Axelsson, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Tom, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), chad, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Tom, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Xue Fuqiao, 2014/01/19
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr],
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/19
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Phillip Lord, 2014/01/20
- New tutorial (was: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]), Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/20
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/20
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Glenn Morris, 2014/01/20
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/20
- New tutorial (was: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]), Phillip Lord, 2014/01/21
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Phillip Lord, 2014/01/21
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Christophe Poncy, 2014/01/07
- Re: Apologia for bzr, joakim, 2014/01/07