[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clang vs free software
From: |
unic0rn |
Subject: |
Re: clang vs free software |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:06:30 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Emacs (and all GNU packages involving C code) should be designed to
> work best with GCC. There should be nothing to encourage users not to
> use our compiler.
IMHO, users should be encouraged to explore their freedom.
wasn't it Apple that decided that they know best what's better for
their userbase?
- Re: clang vs free software, (continued)
- Re: clang vs free software, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, Helmut Eller, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, David Engster, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software,
unic0rn <=
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/20
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/19
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, John Yates, 2014/01/20
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, David Kastrup, 2014/01/20
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, John Yates, 2014/01/20
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/19
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/19
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/19
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/19
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/19