[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Progress report on git-blame (was: RFC - cleaning up /etc)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Progress report on git-blame (was: RFC - cleaning up /etc) |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:34:32 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:06:43 +0100
>
> my current code (which is not ready for submission as it does not
> support all options of git-blame yet) takes 2 seconds for the git-blame
> step as opposed to the 40 seconds the system binary does. That's at
> least encouraging and one can expect some of that to be pure output
> time.
Thank you for doing this.
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, (continued)
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Ulrich Mueller, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Glenn Morris, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, David Kastrup, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/11
- Progress report on git-blame (was: RFC - cleaning up /etc), David Kastrup, 2014/01/24
- Re: Progress report on git-blame (was: RFC - cleaning up /etc),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, martin rudalics, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/25