[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Progress report on git-blame
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Progress report on git-blame |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:21:21 +0100 |
> Well, I finally did "git gc --aggressive" on my Emacs repository and
> tried again git-blame src/xdisp.c and the times got considerably _worse_
> than before the packing (though the repository went to about a quarter
> in size). So after my fixes the run time in real use cases is probably
> dominated by unpacking the various revisions, particularly with a
> well-compressed repository.
Seems like the second law of thermodynamics still applies ...
martin
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, (continued)
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, David Kastrup, 2014/01/11
- Re: RFC - cleaning up /etc, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/11
- Progress report on git-blame (was: RFC - cleaning up /etc), David Kastrup, 2014/01/24
- Re: Progress report on git-blame (was: RFC - cleaning up /etc), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, David Kastrup, 2014/01/25
- Re: Progress report on git-blame, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/25