[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clang vs free software
From: |
Helmut Eller |
Subject: |
Re: clang vs free software |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:36:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, Jan 26 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> And it's rather exasperating if people keep pretending that nobody has
> thought about this before and that they have the better answers
> rendering decades of painstaking legal and technical work redundant.
Now you have me convinced: working on GCC/Emacs integration would be a
waste of my time.
Helmut
- Re: clang vs free software, (continued)
- Re: clang vs free software, Daniel Colascione, 2014/01/25
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/25
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Daniel Colascione, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Helmut Eller, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software,
Helmut Eller <=
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, RĂ¼diger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, David Engster, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, unic0rn, 2014/01/21
- Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/20