[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: save-excursion and the mark
|
From: |
Yuri Khan |
|
Subject: |
Re: save-excursion and the mark |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:58:30 +0700 |
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm tempted to throw away the "save&restore mark" feature, since it
> seems to be never used, and I've actually bumped into a few cases where
> it's more annoying than useful (tho I wouldn't call them truly harmful).
Perhaps it can be solved in a backward-compatible way, by introducing
two new functions, say, save-point-excursion and save-mark-excursion,
then implementing save-excursion in terms of their composition and
cross-referencing both from its docstring?
Re: save-excursion and the mark, Barry Warsaw, 2015/02/24
- Re: save-excursion and the mark, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/24
- Re: save-excursion and the mark, Barry Warsaw, 2015/02/24
- Re: save-excursion and the mark, Artur Malabarba, 2015/02/24
- Re: save-excursion and the mark, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/24
- Re: save-excursion and the mark, Artur Malabarba, 2015/02/24
- Re: save-excursion and the mark, Barry Warsaw, 2015/02/25
- Re: save-excursion and the mark, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/25
- RE: save-excursion and the mark, Drew Adams, 2015/02/25
Re: save-excursion and the mark, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/25