[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:02:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>> Maybe this feature could be used by ‘C-x v h’ (vc-region-history)
>> in case when there is no active region. Currently it signals
>> an error "The mark is not active now", but could use the name
>> of the current defun for '-L :defun:filename'.
>
> Wouldn't mark-defun give a better result (i.e. let the major mode
> determine the corresponding region rather than rely on Git's xfuncname)?
I can confirm that 'C-M-h C-x v h' produces the same result as
'-L :funcname:filename' for most cases, and is more reliable
for ambiguous names like 'next-line'.
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, (continued)
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/16
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Andreas Schwab, 2019/03/17
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/03/17
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Juri Linkov, 2019/03/17
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/17
- Re: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?,
Juri Linkov <=