Re: The netsec thread

[Paul Eggert]

On 9/5/19 5:12 AM, Robert Pluim wrote:
> GNUTLS_TLS1_3 is not a define, itʼs an enum, so we canʼt
> check for it with the pre-processor. I guess that means we have to
> check based on the GnuTLS version

There's a simpler way; I installed the attached.

By the way, can you verify that :safe-renegotiation is also irrelevant 
for DTLS? I'm asking because GNUTLS_DTLS1_2 etc. are greater than 
GNUTLS_TLS1_3 and so "proto <= GNUTLS_TLS1_2" yields 0 for them. I 
assume that since DTLS is for datagrams there is no renegotiation and so 
no :safe-renegotation is needed, but I don't know DTLS (I don't even 
know whether Emacs supports DTLS) and it'd be helpful to get a 
more-expert opinion. Thanks.

0001-Port-safe-renegotiation-test-to-GnuTLS-3.6.3.patch
Description: Text Data