[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The netsec thread
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: The netsec thread |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Sep 2019 15:10:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> * src/gnutls.c (Fgnutls_peer_status): Don’t put the
> safe-renegotiation indication into the status in TLS 1.3, which
> removed support for renegotiation.
[...]
> +#ifdef GNUTLS_TLS1_3
> + bool older_proto = proto < GNUTLS_TLS1_3;
> +#else
> + bool older_proto = true;
> +#endif
> + if (older_proto)
> + result = nconc2
> + (result, list2 (intern (":safe-renegotiation"),
> + gnutls_safe_renegotiation_status (state) ? Qt : Qnil));
Looks good to me.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: The netsec thread, (continued)
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/09/03
- Re: The netsec thread, Paul Eggert, 2019/09/03
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/09/03
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/04
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/09/04
- Re: The netsec thread, Paul Eggert, 2019/09/04
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/09/04
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/09/05
- Re: The netsec thread, Paul Eggert, 2019/09/05
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/09/05
- Re: The netsec thread,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=