[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:24:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 |
On 2020-02-26 16:18, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> 26 feb. 2020 kl. 22.00 skrev Paul Eggert <address@hidden>:
>
>> The bug noted by Andreas should also be fixed. More specifically, I suggest
>> having Emacs diagnose the typo only when GNU grep diagnoses it, as it's
>> better to be consistent among GNU applications. Grep diagnoses the contents
>> of [...] if all the following are true:
>>
>> * The first character is ":".
>> * The last character is ":".
>> * There is some non-":" character.
>> * There are no ranges, char/equiv classes or collation elements.
>
> the patch already worked according to your above criteria
I think your patch disallows thing like [:-:], which grep allows.
- RE: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28