[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:01:24 +0100 |
26 feb. 2020 kl. 22.24 skrev Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden>:
> I think your patch disallows thing like [:-:], which grep allows.
Very well, I've now made it more forgiving in this respect. Thank you!
Paul, I believe I misunderstood you at first; the change does not check for
POSIX equivalence classes or collation elements, on the grounds that these are
not accepted syntax in Emacs regexps anyway. If you think it really is worth
the trouble to add the analysis then say so, but there is a smell of
gold-plating (mixing metaphors) here.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28