[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:40:05 +0200 |
> From: Mattias Engdegård <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:04:12 +0100
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> What about adding a variable controlling the change, defaulting to the
> stricter semantics?
No, let's leave the default as it is now. Those who want such
suspicious regular expressions flagged will customize the variable to
a non-default value. Like they do with the warning options of a
compiler.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/02/29