[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> In Emacs's own compiler, all warnings are on by default:
[...]
> We all agree that this is as it should be, because although experienced
> users would know how to enable the warnings, it is those who don't that need
> them the most.
Actually, from where I stand the warnings have two purposes:
1- Communicate with our users.
2- Help catch errors.
And from that point of view, the first is the main reason why they're
enabled by default.
Stefan
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/26