Re: Word wrap for non-whitespace-seperated language

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Yuan Fu <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:44:51 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden,
>  address@hidden
> 
> >>> Without truly filling the lines, do the commands C-a, C-n, etc work 
> >>> properly?
> > 
> >> It depends on the commands: C-n/p works fine (given
> >> line-move-visual is t), but C-a/e moves to the end of buffer line,
> >> which is the beginning/end of the paragraph in a users eyes
> > 
> > I was afraid it would be like that.
> > 
> > I suppose that the rectangle commands don't work, and C-x = does
> > something unhelpful.  Is that so?  What about C-x TAB?
> > 
> > If all the commands that ought to make sense for such text
> > understand how the display shows the line-wrapping, and DTRT,
> > I suppose that will be as good as real wrapping.  Would you like to
> > work on that?
> 
> For all the commands, the behavior of flywrap (I’m calling it flywrap now) 
> should be identical to that of normally redisplay word wrapping:

No, with word-wrap C-a/C-e work as you'd expect: they move to the
beginning/end of the visual line, not the physical line.