[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2020 17:35:39 +0300 |
> From: Štěpán Němec <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:20:52 +0100
>
> > I don't see that the commentary says the code in this file must be
> > inline. If something in the wording implies that, let's change the
> > wording so that it doesn't.
>
> Thank you. In that case I suggest we remove the NB sentence, as IMO it
> adds more confusion than useful information.
How about if instead of removing, we reword it so that it only talks
about the macros in the file?
- policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Tassilo Horn, 2020/03/22
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/28
- Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/28