[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:33:50 +0200 |
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:14:52 -0400, ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) said:
Alfred> following recent discussions I've started toying with what I've
pushed on
Alfred> scratch/modern-mode.
Alfred> What some find modern, some will find old. What some find old, some
Alfred> will find modern. What was once modern will become old again, and
Alfred> what was old again will become modern.
Alfred> A different name would be more appropriate.
cadt-mode? (with apologies to jwz)
Robert
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/17
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/18
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Ergus, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?,
Robert Pluim <=
Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16