[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jan 2021 12:58:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 06.01.2021 07:02, Richard Stallman wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> https://repology.org/project/nmap/packages (okay, this shows the
> homepage too) clearly shows the non-standard license where it can.
I am having trouble understanding that page. It gives a lot of
details but does not explicitly say how they relate to each other.
In particular, I don't know who the many packages listed
relate to each other. I can only guess that they all relate to
the program nmap somehow.
Seems like it shows all packages that have "nmap" in their name or
description string there.
Also, I don't know what facts that page is trying to present.
Check out https://repology.org/about:
About
Repology is a service which tracks and compares package versions in more
than 120 package repositories.
Purpose
For package/port maintainers:
Discover new releases of software you maintain packages for
Find new projects to package
Get in touch with fellow maintainers to improve packages together
Keep package naming and versioning schemes in sync to other
repos for your and your user's convenience
Fix problems detected by repology, such as broken links
For software authors:
Keep track of where and how well your project is packaged
Keep in touch with your product package maintainers
For users:
Discover new releases of software you use
Pick distribution most suitable for you, in terms of package
quantity, freshness or stability
Keep in touch with maintainers of software you use
Most importantly, does Repology list nmap with nonfree packages as a
peculiar exception because it has had a peculiar history recently? Or
does repology.org regularly list nonfree programs without trying to
distinguish?
It tries to provide the correct license information. That's about it.
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, (continued)
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/07
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2021/01/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jean Louis, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Arthur Miller, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jean Louis, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Arthur Miller, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jean Louis, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/06
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/07
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jean Louis, 2021/01/07