[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some improvements for cl-flet
From: |
akater |
Subject: |
Re: Some improvements for cl-flet |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:23:07 +0000 |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> Is there a good reason to support cl-symbol-macrolet at all?
> It is a bizarre construct.
People largely agree that with-slots is beneficial, for example. with-slots
wouldn't be possible without symbol-macrolet.
Both macrolet and symbol-macrolet (and flet as well) are indispensable in
macros. macrolet is effectively a built-in code-walker and code transformer,
the most powerful functionality accessible to end user in CL and likely in
Elisp as well. symbol-macrolet is comparable (it can be used to achieve
effects that can't be achieved with macrolet).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, akater, 2021/10/06
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/07
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/08
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet,
akater <=
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Michael Heerdegen, 2021/10/09
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/09
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Po Lu, 2021/10/10
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, João Távora, 2021/10/10
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/10
- RE: [External] : Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Drew Adams, 2021/10/10
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/11
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, João Távora, 2021/10/11
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/12
- Re: Some improvements for cl-flet, Po Lu, 2021/10/11