Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: theo@thornhill.no,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,  casouri@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 00:13:03 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> That answers my question.  The point is whether the usage of ...-ts-mode
> >> major modes is recommended or provided with a "we reserve the right to
> >> change anything"-like caveat, so one shouldn't rely too much on their
> >> public interface.
> >
> > I guess it depends on who "one" is for this purpose.  Which code wants
> > to rely on these symbols, and why?
> 
> Both emacs-internal packages and external packages that depend on Emacs
> 29.

Are there any concrete examples of those?  If not, let's delay this
discussion until such concrete cases emerge, because discussing a
theoretical issue is many times not very productive, as it's easy to
talk past each other when there's nothing concrete in sight.