[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad UI defaults
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: bad UI defaults |
Date: |
05 Sep 2003 13:00:53 +0900 |
Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> Personally I would prefer boxes with check marks. These are a lot
> clearer and, to me, also look better.
Yes I agree this would make a much bigger difference than adjusting the
border size (even with thick borders, the difference between an `in' 3D
button and an `out' 3D button is sometimes easy to miss).
A similar improvement would be to use shading to highlight selected
menu items, in addition to the 3Dness change.
> I do not believe that the Lucid menu widgets offer this as an
> alternative, however.
It's just a matter of hacking... :-)
>From what little experience I have with modifying the Lucid widgets,
they're rather easy to hack on, actually, especially if you can get away
with just drawing stuff (as opposed to having to allocate [and thus keep
track of] any new resources colors/pixmaps/etc).
I wonder what people's thoughts are about the future of the various
widget toolkits that emacs supports, though; I guess Lucid will remain
the default for a fairly long time?
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/02
Re: bad UI defaults,
Miles Bader <=
Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/04
- Re: bad UI defaults, Kim F. Storm, 2003/09/05
- Re: bad UI defaults, Jan D., 2003/09/05
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/07
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/09
Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/06
Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/06