[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:05:35 -0400 |
I've been meaning to add precedence annotations to syntax-tables (so you can
get precedence-aware sexp movement and/or indentation, like I did in my
sml-mode code).
It sounds interesting, but what change in behavior is there? Can you
show us a specific case where this would do something different?
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2004/09/10
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/10
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2004/09/12
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/13
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2004/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2004/09/17
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan, 2004/09/18
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan, 2004/09/20
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Miles Bader, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/22
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/22
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/24
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan, 2004/09/24
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/25