Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode

[Stefan]

>     I've been meaning to add precedence annotations to syntax-tables (so
>     you can get precedence-aware sexp movement and/or indentation, like
>     I did in my sml-mode code).

> It sounds interesting, but what change in behavior is there?  Can you
> show us a specific case where this would do something different?

Here is an example with indentation:

        foo
        + bar
          * baz
        + toto
          / titi

And in sml-mode, if point is just before the first + and you hit C-M-t
you end up with

        bar
          * baz
        + foo
        + toto
          / titi


-- Stefan