[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:52:49 +0300

> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:07:51 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden
> This actually brings us a step closer to another proposal that is
> needed for the multi-tty branch: each one of the term/*.el files
> should define an autoloaded function called
> TERMNAME-initialize-terminal. Then when emacs wants to initialize a
> terminal TERMNAME it does something like:
> (if (fboundp 'TERMNAME-initialize-terminal)
>     (TERMNAME-initialize-terminal))
> instead of having the terminal initialization performed (as it is
> currently done) by doing (load "term/TERMNAME") 

Sorry, I don't understand how this will work.  If the function
TERMNAME-initialize-terminal is autoloaded (i.e. it will have an
autoload cookie that would cause it to go into loaddefs.el), the
fboundp test is going to yield t for every such function, regardless
of the TERMINAL part, right?

What am I missing?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]