[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:52:49 +0300 |
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:07:51 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> This actually brings us a step closer to another proposal that is
> needed for the multi-tty branch: each one of the term/*.el files
> should define an autoloaded function called
> TERMNAME-initialize-terminal. Then when emacs wants to initialize a
> terminal TERMNAME it does something like:
> (if (fboundp 'TERMNAME-initialize-terminal)
> (TERMNAME-initialize-terminal))
> instead of having the terminal initialization performed (as it is
> currently done) by doing (load "term/TERMNAME")
Sorry, I don't understand how this will work. If the function
TERMNAME-initialize-terminal is autoloaded (i.e. it will have an
autoload cookie that would cause it to go into loaddefs.el), the
fboundp test is going to yield t for every such function, regardless
of the TERMINAL part, right?
What am I missing?
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/22
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/23
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/07/25
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/26
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/07/26
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/26
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/07/26