[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode" |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:47:54 -0500 |
Now, I tried in vain to figure out where the lazy-lock-mode is
possibly set in *my own library files. and/or impoted from emacs archive*.
You can debug that by means of debug-on-entry; call it at the start
of your .emacs file and you should find out what enables lazy-lock.
I would not want to change turn-on-lazy-lock to enable jit-lock
instead of lazy-lock; that would be incoherent. What MIGHT make sense
is to make lazy-lock-mode an alias for jit-lock-mode. That is
coherent, but somewhat drastic.
Are we sure that there is no reason at all for anyone to use lazy-lock
any more?
- "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/20
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Jason Rumney, 2006/11/20
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/22
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Richard Stallman, 2006/11/22
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/24
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Richard Stallman, 2006/11/25
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/27
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/27
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/28