[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: redundant DOC files
Re: redundant DOC files
Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:01:39 +0000
No Gnus v0.6, Emacs/22.214.171.124 (2007-01-20), Fedora 6 gnu/linux
On 2007-01-20, Eli Zaretskii said:
>> From: Leo <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:34:24 +0000
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 10 10:42 DOC-126.96.36.199
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 10 12:09 DOC-188.8.131.52
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 14 04:52 DOC-184.108.40.206
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 14 04:57 DOC-220.127.116.11
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 18 21:46 DOC-18.104.22.168
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 18 21:48 DOC-22.214.171.124
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 20 06:08 DOC-126.96.36.199
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M Jan 20 06:11 DOC-188.8.131.52
>> Can someone tell me what is the use of this DOC-* file?
> These are the doc strings for all the functions and variables that are
> preloaded into Emacs.
Thank you for this.
>> And why we have to have that many DOC-* files?
> Each one goes with the corresponding emacs-22.0.92.N binary which you
> have in your src directory. The theory behind this is that you might
> wish to try an older build, e.g. to see whether some problem you find
> in the latest build happens in earlier builds a swell. When you do
> that, you will need the corresponding DOC-* file, because otherwise
> documentation commands could show you garbage.
Those emacs-22.0.92.N lying in the emacs/src dir will use the
DOC-22.0.92.N in emacs/etc. Thus I agree all versions should be kept
for testing purpose etc as you mentioned.
But when one does make install/bootstrap, only one emacs version is
installed while *ALL* DOC-* versions are installed i.e. the
*installed* old DOC-* files can neither be used by the installed emacs
binary nor by those in emacs/src. That's why I think they are
>> Because each time after installing Emacs, the first thing I do is
>> go to the data-directory and delete all of them except the one
>> correspond to current Emacs version.
> If you don't need the previous emacs-* binaries, it's okay to remove
> them and the corresponding DOC-* files.
>> The point is if I have 50 builds then the DOC-* will take up more than
>> 100M disk space.
> Whoever cares about 100MB of disk space these days? ;-)
> And 50 builds give you 600MB worth of Emacs binaries (which you never
> mentioned in your message), so adding 100MB more to that is hardly a
> major issue, is it?
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
Re: redundant DOC files, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/21