[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FSDG status of chromium
|
From: |
Marius Bakke |
|
Subject: |
Re: FSDG status of chromium |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:48 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.27 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Brett Gilio <address@hidden> writes:
> On 09/25/2018 03:22 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
>>
>> So at least it is apparently possible to get a working binary with only
>> free sources.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Can you verify that the debian package is only working with free
> sources, and not simply reiterating the misconception that the chromium
> browser is licensed under BSD? By that, I mean going after what Bill was
> saying of auditing every single component of the chromium browser?
I would like to know prior research on this subject. Are parts of
Chromium considered non-free? Is there a reason not to trust the BSD
license?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature