[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?
From: |
Paul Jewell |
Subject: |
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 12:32:14 +0000 |
> On 20 Feb 2022, at 10:07, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
>
> Guix has a policy against including malware[citation needed 2], and
> furthering global warming[3] (and energy prices[4], if [3] is not bad
> enough for you) seems rather bad behaviour to me.
>
> Would these miners be considered malware in Guix?
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
To directly answer your question, in my opinion miners should not be considered
malware in Guix.
Much as I don’t like the adverse climate impact of miners and crypto, I think
it is the thin end of the wedge of packages are restricted based on climate
impact. I think we should stick to restrictions based on licence conditions. Of
course, this is just a personal opinion, and has no more validity than your
opinion!!
Best regards,
Paul
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?, Taylan Kammer, 2022/02/20
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?, Christine Lemmer-Webber, 2022/02/20
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?, Jonathan McHugh, 2022/02/20
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?,
Paul Jewell <=
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/02/20
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?, Ryan Sundberg, 2022/02/20
Re: Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware?, Attila Lendvai, 2022/02/21