[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾 |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:49:47 +0100 |
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 00:05, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> For emacs-minimal, if considered to only bytecompile (.elc) and not
> native compile, this libgccgit seems unexpected, indeed. Well, is
> native compilation disabled for emacs-minimal? I guess not. :-)
The package emacs-minimal is only for bytecompiling and configured
without native compilation, IIUC. Thus the reference to libgccgit
appears unexpected, then tackled by Josselin and fixed by Liliana in
#60831 [1].
Cool! :-)
1:
<http://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/f8e96b5d959815f77501beadeaca9139b3fb2d11.camel@gmail.com>
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, (continued)
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Akib Azmain Turja, 2023/01/15
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2023/01/15
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, zimoun, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾,
zimoun <=
- Grandfathering store paths considered harmful (was: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾), Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/18
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Simon Tournier, 2023/01/20
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/01/20
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, kiasoc5, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, indieterminacy, 2023/01/18
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Simon Tournier, 2023/01/20