[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾 |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:06:06 +0100 |
Hi,
On jeu., 19 janv. 2023 at 15:32, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> I also wonder how much of the space is taken by debug output. Would
>> making graft derivations substitutable help?
>
> Graft derivations are not substitutable because it’s usually faster to
> “build” them locally than to download them (it depends on package size,
> hard disk performance, and network performance; my experience with an
> SSD is that grafting is always faster than downloading, even over FTTH.)
Recently, I built a large profile with oulà many many grafts and my
machine spent some time for that.
Would it be possible to substitute the result after applying grafts?
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, (continued)
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, zimoun, 2023/01/17
- Grandfathering store paths considered harmful (was: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾), Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/18
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Simon Tournier, 2023/01/20
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/01/20
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, kiasoc5, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, indieterminacy, 2023/01/18
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾,
Simon Tournier <=
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Efraim Flashner, 2023/01/17
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Simon Tournier, 2023/01/17
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Paul Jewell, 2023/01/18