[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive
From: |
Peter Simons |
Subject: |
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive |
Date: |
27 Jan 2005 14:38:27 +0100 |
Tom Howard writes:
> Sorry, it think I misunderstood you.
No problem, I'm sure I've misunderstood you too on the
occasion.
> From what I understand now, a macro can have two
> versions, the maintainers version, which goes in the
> documentation section and an ac-archive version which is
> specified with the @version tag. Is this correct?
Not quite. A macro in the archive does have _one_ version:
The date of its last modification in the archive. That's the
version the archive provides. What else you do in the
documentation or payload is your business, not the
archive's.
Peter
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Tom Howard, 2005/01/25
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/26
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27