[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FHS
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: FHS |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Jan 2002 23:48:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.7 (Y.Dþzaki) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) (i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.8) |
> > AutoConf should support very convenient mechanisms to handle whatever
> > layout makes sysadmins happy. --with-gnu-layout or --with-fhs-layout
> > would be good. Maybe better: --with-layout-file=/path/to/layout/file ?
>
> My understanding is that you can do this with config.site. I should try
> to get that approach working for our setup, as it's probably the right way
> of doing things.
One problem is that config.site is kinda lame - we really need nested or
hierarchical config.site support.
I haven't see the case where a single config.site will really be of much
use.
Then again, I haven't looked lately; I could be wrong.
H
- Re: FHS, (continued)
- Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Bruce Korb, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS,
Harlan Stenn <=
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/07
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/07
Re: FHS, Bruce Korb, 2002/01/05
Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05
Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/05
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05