[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FHS
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: FHS |
Date: |
06 Jan 2002 16:46:42 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Harlan Stenn <address@hidden> writes:
> > The changes here for the GNU Coding Standards (which I'm proposing,
> > and RMS has now agreed to) will not add any new paths, it will simply
> > change some that currently exist.
>
> For this to be effective and useful, it would mean that most every GNU
> package would need to be updated, right?
Eventually. Packages do not spring into compliance instantaneously.
> If this meant converting more packages to automake and upgrading the version
> of autoconf that these packages used, that would be a Good Thing.
More or less, yes.
- Re: FHS, (continued)
- Re: FHS, Lars Hecking, 2002/01/05
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/05
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/05
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05
- Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: FHS, Bruce Korb, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/07
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/07
Re: FHS, Bruce Korb, 2002/01/05
Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05
Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/05