autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FHS

From: Harlan Stenn
Subject: Re: FHS
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 19:34:23 -0500
User-agent: EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.7 (Y.DŽþzaki) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) (i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.8) 
> The changes here for the GNU Coding Standards (which I'm proposing,
> and RMS has now agreed to) will not add any new paths, it will simply
> change some that currently exist.

For this to be effective and useful, it would mean that most every GNU
package would need to be updated, right?

If this meant converting more packages to automake and upgrading the version 
of autoconf that these packages used, that would be a Good Thing.

H
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]