[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noooooooooo!
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: Noooooooooo! |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:12:13 +0000 |
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > Josef noted that he did not want this to change. I'm inclined to agree
> > with him, people who are cross-compiling may not have all of the `tools'
> > available as triplet-prefixed-name, but are likely to have their PATH
> > set correctly to point at the cross-tools.
I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the
first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning.
But I do believe that proper naming is the way to go.
Then I created the proper names using symlinks and the problem went
away.
I've yet to see a case where fixing this in the way autoconf "wants" is
even mildly difficult.
If one doesn't have root, just make a subdir that contains the symlinks
and add that subdir to the PATH.
If it's time to "go one way or the other", let's DTRT and lose this old
hackaround.
H
- RE: Noooooooooo!, Duft Markus, 2008/09/01
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Daniel E. Macks, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Brian Dessent, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!,
Harlan Stenn <=
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Allan Clark, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Autoconf will (not?) detect cross-tools unprefixed (was: Noooooooooo!), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Bob Rossi, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Steffen DETTMER, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02