[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DIST_COMMON broke
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: DIST_COMMON broke |
Date: |
07 Feb 2001 13:50:53 -0700 |
>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
>> I'm checking this in.
Pavel> I'm sorry, but the bug seems to be yours. The new test fails
Pavel> after automake.in changes from revision 1.848 to 1.849.
Oh, I know it is mine..
Pavel> In fact it says directly: "Don't push @inputs onto the dist list."
Pavel> Not good. Many programs rely on that.
It is more complicated than that. The &require_file_with_conf_line
call sometimes pushes onto the dist list.
This area still requires more work. I think I know another case where
it can fail: suppose you do `AC_OUTPUT(subdir/foo)' where there is no
Makefile.am in subdir? Then I think no rule to rebuild subdir/foo
will be generated.
Tom
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07