avr-gcc-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] why are the whole source lines not all visible in .ls


From: Simon Han
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] why are the whole source lines not all visible in .lst?
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:33:11 -0700 (PDT)

I also notice that when I used '-Os' flag, there is no source line in
.lst files.  But if I change to '-O1 -g' flag, all of the source lines
appear.  Not complaining, but want to make sure if this is the case for
everyone.

Thank you,
Simon

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, gouy yann wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> i don't know if it is exactly the rigth mailing list
> but, IMHO, it seems not that bad.
>
> most of the time, the source lines are not visible in
> .lst file for static functions.
>
> at first, I think it was because they got "inlined"
> but some weren't (some we're called via pointers to
> them) and the behaviour finally seems more chaotic
> than this first quick explanation.
>
> I've done some tests giving avr-objdump the following
> parameters "avr-objdump -h -S -x -d -s -g -t -T -a -f
> -p" (the big list :) ).
> it appears that the debugging informations in the .elf
> file gives the exact fit between the source line and
> the asm address.
>
> so, is this a bug in avr-objdump or a misuse of the
> parameters?
>
> I'm using WinAVR 20040720 but I've noticed the same
> behaviour in the previous versions.
>
> regards.
>
>       Yann
>
>
>
> =====
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vous manquez d’espace pour stocker vos mails ?
> Yahoo! Mail vous offre GRATUITEMENT 100 Mo !
> Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/
>
> Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour 
> dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur 
> http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]